- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
- Messages
- 6,244
- Likes
- 13,129
- Degree
- 9
In our talks on the forum about motivation and happiness and peace, I've been seeing a trend in most responses that's the opposite of what I do.
I guess you could chalk it up to the difference between Western and Eastern philosophy, where they tend to involve "Adding on to" versus "Taking away from," respectively. Or, as I look at it, complicating versus simplifying.
The key difference is between quality and quantity. Bandaids versus healing. Taking medicine instead of removing poison. Filling the void instead of feeding the void.
A great example would be our relationship with food. Take these two approaches for example:
But with dieting, that's a psychologically active approach. As far as our minds go, we're adding onto our lives. We're exerting energy, self-control, restriction, discipline, all in the name of removing something. But you don't really have to remove anything, you just have to let it go. When you let something go, it's gone. It's not a part of you any more. With dieting, we're all still very caught up in food. We may not be eating the bad food, but we're thinking about it and constantly have to make choices about it. We're still very caught up in the essence of foodness.
And that's the key difference. Remaining in the is-ness of a thing, versus letting the bad fall away and not having to think about it at all.
If we're having to add diets, add scheduling, add social activity, add exercise, actively remove video games and movie watching... the problem is we keep trying to patch a problem instead of returning to the core code and fixing it.
I saw someone talking about their consumption levels of entertainment being problematic. All you have to do is be more selective. Choose higher quality entertainment and you'll get satiated and won't need more and more lower quality entertainment. If you have to schedule time for friends because you have little time due to your workload, then you need to let some of that fall away and into the hands of freelancers.
I'm not saying that I'm not guilty of all these things, because I am. But my fixes aren't excruciating. I can't accept another layer of mind games in order to fix the previous one. You simply can't solve a problem on the same tier of problem-ness. You have to ascend to another level mentally, and that always includes a refinement of your approach, versus more of the same approach that got you where you are in the first place.
There are people who have full time day jobs who work overtime and deal with their kids sporting events, homework, dinner, bed time, and have every moment of their weekend scheduled too. And yet they remain happy. Then you have a bunch of us who sit at home for work, make decent to baller money, living the dream, can do whatever we want whenever we want as long as we maintain our web properties... and yet we're not happy.
I propose that that's because of the open-endedness of our void. Theirs is scheduled to the brim and all spontaneity is removed. They have security in that structure. But for us, we have to design every moment of our lives. And that's a bigger burden than people realize. And I propose that the solution is less... less of low-quality everything. More of higher quality doses of work, eating, exercise, socializing, entertainment, leisureliness.
And the net difference ends up equaling less time and suffering overall, but a positive gain in quality and being satiated by life.
I guess you could chalk it up to the difference between Western and Eastern philosophy, where they tend to involve "Adding on to" versus "Taking away from," respectively. Or, as I look at it, complicating versus simplifying.
The key difference is between quality and quantity. Bandaids versus healing. Taking medicine instead of removing poison. Filling the void instead of feeding the void.
A great example would be our relationship with food. Take these two approaches for example:
- Dieting
- Eating less cruddy food and more healthy food
But with dieting, that's a psychologically active approach. As far as our minds go, we're adding onto our lives. We're exerting energy, self-control, restriction, discipline, all in the name of removing something. But you don't really have to remove anything, you just have to let it go. When you let something go, it's gone. It's not a part of you any more. With dieting, we're all still very caught up in food. We may not be eating the bad food, but we're thinking about it and constantly have to make choices about it. We're still very caught up in the essence of foodness.
And that's the key difference. Remaining in the is-ness of a thing, versus letting the bad fall away and not having to think about it at all.
If we're having to add diets, add scheduling, add social activity, add exercise, actively remove video games and movie watching... the problem is we keep trying to patch a problem instead of returning to the core code and fixing it.
I saw someone talking about their consumption levels of entertainment being problematic. All you have to do is be more selective. Choose higher quality entertainment and you'll get satiated and won't need more and more lower quality entertainment. If you have to schedule time for friends because you have little time due to your workload, then you need to let some of that fall away and into the hands of freelancers.
I'm not saying that I'm not guilty of all these things, because I am. But my fixes aren't excruciating. I can't accept another layer of mind games in order to fix the previous one. You simply can't solve a problem on the same tier of problem-ness. You have to ascend to another level mentally, and that always includes a refinement of your approach, versus more of the same approach that got you where you are in the first place.
There are people who have full time day jobs who work overtime and deal with their kids sporting events, homework, dinner, bed time, and have every moment of their weekend scheduled too. And yet they remain happy. Then you have a bunch of us who sit at home for work, make decent to baller money, living the dream, can do whatever we want whenever we want as long as we maintain our web properties... and yet we're not happy.
I propose that that's because of the open-endedness of our void. Theirs is scheduled to the brim and all spontaneity is removed. They have security in that structure. But for us, we have to design every moment of our lives. And that's a bigger burden than people realize. And I propose that the solution is less... less of low-quality everything. More of higher quality doses of work, eating, exercise, socializing, entertainment, leisureliness.
And the net difference ends up equaling less time and suffering overall, but a positive gain in quality and being satiated by life.